38
This study explores the colossal dyad statue of Amun and Mut as a significant
example of archaeological reunification. It aims to examine the
transformation of the artifact from a fragmented state to unification and to
analyze how this unity enhanced its value as both a historical and artistic
piece. This process ultimately led to the artifact's display as a masterpiece at
the Grand Egyptian Museum. This study employs a mixed-methods
approach, collecting both qualitative and quantitative field research data
alongside an extensive literature review. It aims to assess visitor experience
and gather varied perspectives on the reunification process using semi-
structured interviews and visitor surveys. The study concluded that the
reunification of the statue was not only a restoration process but rather a
"restoration of its historical identity." It is regarded as a resurrection of the
statue and its narrative. The reunification process improved visitors' cognitive
clarity and provided specialists with a more accurate ability to interpret the
artifact's archeological context. The study suggests that reunification is the
most effective method for converting archaeological fragments into an
engaging historical narrative for museum audiences.
Keywords
Dispersed Artefacts;
Fragmented Statues;
Reunification;
Museum Interpretation;
Visitor Experience.
QALAMOS
Heritage Studies
Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 38-47
Published: Jan. 2026
ID : QALAMOS.2.1.1.2026.004 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21218405
The Impact of Reuniting a Colossal Dyad
of Amun and Mut
Marwa Hamada
mhf11@fayoum.edu.eg
ORCID 0000-0002-6539-3541
Faculty of archaeology, Fayoum university, Fayoum, (Egypt)
Abstract
Received: Sep. 17, 2025
Accepted: Dec. 02, 2025
Published: Jan 1, 2026
Marwa Hamada
pg. 39
1. Introduction
This research is part of my doctoral dissertation. Artifacts serve as crucial evidence of human
civilization's history. Their importance extends beyond being mere physical remnants of the
past; they act as repositories of cultural memory and historical identity. Many of these items,
particularly those from ancient Egypt, have been scattered across various historical periods due
to several factors, including early discoveries, collection policies, exchanges, looting, illegal
trading, official gifting, and acquisitions by museums and international agencies (Stevenson
2019, pp. 10-11). This scattering has led to the loss of the artifacts' original context, which
negatively impacts their scientific and interpretive understanding and, consequently, our ability
to fully grasp the cultural and historical narratives they embody (Abd el-Gawad & Stevenson
2021, pp. 122-123). The significance of reuniting dispersed artifacts has developed as a
contemporary issue in heritage studies. This approach aids in restoring the original context of
the artifacts, improving the precision of archaeological interpretation, and reconstructing the
historical story more carefully. This method enhances the visitor's experience at the museum
and increases their comprehension and enjoyment of the artifact's cultural significance
(Chahine 2025, p. 41). The term “reunification” refers to the process of reassembling or
reconnecting elements that were once a cohesive unit but have been divided or dispersed over
time, either physically or cognitively/interpretively (Punzalan 2013, p. 23).
The term “Reunification” indicates the restoring of original unity after division, emphasizing
the reconstruction of functional or contextual links among the parts (Leitão & Stolfi 2002, pp.
4-6). Both the Cambridge Dictionary (Cambridge University Press) and the Merriam-Webster
Dictionary indicate that the concept of reunification means the act or practice of reuniting
individuals or objects after a period of separation. In Egyptology, reunification indicates the
process of recognizing, matching, and reassembling fragments of a single artifact such as a
statue, sarcophagus, or wall relief that have been separated. Reunification in heritage studies is
not limited to a single model but rather takes several forms depending on the nature of the
intervention and its tools, as follows (Fig.1):
-Physical reunification defines the gathering, reassembling, and restoring of dispersed parts of
a single statue, with the objective of restoring the artifact's physical and visual coherence while
enhancing its historical and interpretive significance (Abate 2019, p. 120).
-Digital Reunification refers to the collection of data, two-dimensional images, and archive
records into a unified online archive or database. It enables researchers to acquire
comprehensive information about dispersed parts in a single "digital file" (Pietroni & Ferdani
2021, p. 19).
Figure 1: Types of reunification processes of scattered objects, designed by Author
Reunification
Physical
Virtual
Digital
The impact of reuniting a colossal dyad of Amun and Mut
40
-Virtual reunification involves using 3D modeling and virtual reality to reconstruct fragmented
artifacts digitally. Researchers "merge" digital replicas of dispersed parts, enabling them to
visualize the complete artifact despite its original pieces being in different locations. This
approach consolidates heritage collections into a digitized representation linked by a common
origin or provenance, as described by Punzalan (Punzalan 2014, p. 16).
This research examines the significance of the reunification processes for scattered objects and
explores the effects of reuniting dispersed artifacts on museum interpretation and visitor
experience. It uses the case study of the statue of Amun and Mut to highlight the scientific
benefits of this process and assess its significance and outcomes.
2. Fragmentation of the Statue of Amun and Mut
Hourig Sourouzian (Director the Colossi of Memnon and Amenhotep III Temple Conservation
Project in Luxor since 1998, Corresponding Member of the German Institute of Archaeology,
and member of the ICOMOS Armenia.) discovered the colossal sculpture of solid limestone
depicting Amun and Mut in the temple of Karnak. After a thorough analysis of the statue's
remains, she identified it as a representation of the god Amun-Ra and the goddess Mut seated
on a throne, with a height of 4.15 meters. The statue originated from Karnak and was previously
located in the northern hall between the IV and V pylons of the grand temple of Amun-Re,
where it was dedicated by Horemheb at the end of the 18th Dynasty (Sourouzian 2018, p. 139).
The scattered remains of this sculpture have been found during 130 years of excavation; it has
been fragmented into multiple parts and is distributed across six locations (Sourouzian 2018,
p. 141). First, the female head was found by Auguste Mariette in 1873 and sent to Cairo, where
it was put on display in the newly founded Museum of Egyptian Antiquities in Boulaq. A few
other fragments, including her double crown and the left half of her chest, were discovered ten
years later by Maspero and joined the female head in the museum in 1903 (Grand Egyptian
Museum 2025). Several large pieces were found by George Legrain, among them the head of
the god Amun, as well as pieces from the throne and the statue base inscribed with the names
of Amun-Re, Lord of Karnak; Mut, Lady of Asheru; and Horemheb (EL-Shorouknews, Aug 1
2025).
A
B
Figure 2 (A), (B): Head of the Goddess Mut as displayed separately in the Egyptian Museum until
1999, and head of God Amun and pieces of the body and throne stored in the Egyptian museums
basement. (Sourouzian, 2018).
Marwa Hamada
pg. 41
The pieces were sent to the Egyptian Museum (fig.2 A, B), waiting to be reassembled. In 1915,
these pieces were transferred to the storerooms of the basement, and so the project of this
monumental sculpture was temporarily abandoned and eventually forgotten (Sourouzian,
2018, p. 142).
During more than a century of excavations at Karnak, other fragments had been unearthed and
kept in storerooms in Cairo and Karnak without having been identified as belonging to this
sculpture. Following her extensive research in the Egyptian Museum, the pieces were grouped,
documented and cleaned, before being mounted on a metallic armature, which proved to be
very advantageous, as it facilitates the addition of new pieces any time they can be found. Now
the reassembled statue (fig. 3 A, B), represents Amun-Rê and Mut seated side by side, the
goddess embracing the god with her left arm (Sourouzian 2018, p. 143).
The statue was transferred from the Egyptian Museum in Tahrir to the Grand Egyptian
Museum, where it is currently displayed as a notable artifact in the exhibition hall, receiving
considerable admiration from visitors and scholars. (Fig. 4).
A great monument of Egyptian art has not only been identified and rescued from loss and
oblivion, but a masterpiece of Egyptian art from the reign of Horemheb has been rediscovered,
conserved and put on display. Every item and every statue have a special meaning because they
were not made at random, but with a specific purpose in mind and a message to express (Connor
2022, p. 51). As a result, such initiatives are comparable to resurrecting art items and
safeguarding antiques and legacy. Hourig's initiatives involving the assembly of statue
fragments are successful and inspiring (Egypt Museum, n.d.).
3. The Effect of Reunification
This statue serves as an example of a museum presentation that relies on the physical
reunification of its fragments. This massive sculpture from the New Kingdom features two
A
B
Figure 3: The reconstruction of Amun and Mut statue in the Egyptian Museum in 1999.
photographed by Author.
The impact of reuniting a colossal dyad of Amun and Mut
42
deities in a formal seated position and shows clear signs of damage and loss. Even with some
parts missing, the reconstruction effectively illustrates what the statue originally looked like,
including its size and overall design. This approach allows the monument to convey meaning
without the need for modern copies or additions. Additionally, it establishes a clear distinction
between the original parts and the missing parts. This approach reflects a contemporary
museum concept that seeks to balance display integrity with a commitment to the authenticity
of artifacts (Sourouzian 2018, p. 144).
Figure 4: The statue of Amun and Mut as a masterpiece in the Main Galleries,
(Gallery 09), (GEM 6729), the Grand Egyptian Museum, photographed by Author.
The impact of reunification on the statue itself.
The statue is depicted as a unified structure. By assembling its pieces, it comes to life and
transforms from a meaningless collection of stones into a cohesive living entity, presenting
itself as a "single body" instead of "separate parts." Although some parts were still missing, the
unification provided a better understanding of the sculpture's original posture, dimensions, and
overall layout, thereby restoring the statue's ability to convey its iconic meaning.
The impact of reunification on the museum interpretation
The physical reunion of the statue at the museum interpretation level creates a distinct visual
narrative based on its shape, rather than relying solely on verbal explanation. The monument
illustrates how the museum should approach fragmentary artifacts, depicting reunification as a
systematic, scientific process that acknowledges the limitations of archaeological
understanding. This approach also encourages discussion on themes such as authenticity, loss,
and the boundaries of reunification, thereby enhancing the interpretive value while maintaining
the artifact's original materiality.
Marwa Hamada
pg. 43
The impact of reunification on the visitor engagement
The researcher employed both qualitative and quantitative methodologies in her study,
incorporating literature reviews alongside a mix of questionnaires, semi-structured interviews,
and random interviews. These methods targeted a diverse range of participants, including
visitors, specialists, museum staff, and students, to assess the impact of reuniting scattered
objects on museum interpretation and the overall visitor experience. So far, the researcher has
distributed approximately 100 surveys and plans to deploy additional questionnaires soon. The
researcher will share the comprehensive results and analyses from these questionnaires in her
doctoral dissertation. This research focuses on "the physical reunification" of scattered
artifacts, specifically illustrated through the case study of the dyad statue of Amun and Mut,
demonstrating how the reunification of its fragmented pieces enhances interpretation and
visitor engagement.
Initially, interviews were held with specialists and staff to collect their insights and some
specific questions related to the statue were directed at a group of professionals and visitors,
with approximately 53 participants responding. These individuals were selected from diverse
backgrounds and positions to ensure a range of perspectives and a comprehensive study. For
example, The museum visitors, specialists, and staff at the Grand Egyptian Museum,
additionally, three restoration professionals from the Faculty of Archaeology at Fayoum University
shared insights on the statue. The study also involved 34 male and female students from different
academic years at the faculty during field visits to the Grand Egyptian Museum, along with surveys
were conducted with ten randomly selected visitors from the general public, to gather their opinions
on the importance of reuniting the "Amun and Mut" statue. The questions were as follows:
1. What is your evaluation of the Amun and Mut dyad following its physical reunification?
How did the statue's completion enhance your understanding?
2. How does reuniting Egyptian artifacts affect a museum's interpretative approach?
3. In general, what are your thoughts on the practice of reuniting fragmented artifacts in
museums? Do you believe this approach improves the comprehension of the artifacts and
enhances the visitor experience?
Most of the answers to the first question were similar, as they emphasize that the statue's
aesthetic value lies not in its physical beauty but in the "artistic secrets" and intrinsic spirit it
embodies. This understanding establishes it as a distinctive model that encourages both
specialists and the general public to engage in ongoing reflection. They were fascinated by the
statue's historical and artistic value, its display, and the way its scattered pieces were carefully
reassembled. The assembly showcases the professionalism of the restorers in preserving the
original pieces while securing them in a way that accentuates the statue's form without
obscuring its history or the effects of time. As a result, viewers are offered a visual experience
that seamlessly blends authenticity with scientific accuracy. The presentation emphasizes the
beauty of the piece and conveys a deep respect for its cultural significance. It also reflects a
significant impact. The restoration process represents both a technical and creative endeavor,
transforming disparate fragments into a unified work that narrates the history of a magnificent
civilization.
In response to the second question, the majority of answers indicated that the reunification of
scattered artifacts, whether in physical or digital form, is a fundamental technique in cultural
heritage management, essential to restoring the historical and artistic context of an artifact. The
fragmentation of an artifact's fragments, whether resulting from its discovery, handling, or
museum acquisition, diminishes its functional and symbolic significance, therefore limiting its
ability for comprehensive scholarly interpretation. The reassembly of these fragments plays a
The impact of reuniting a colossal dyad of Amun and Mut
44
crucial role in reconstructing the artifact's historical narrative. It emphasizes the artistic and
symbolic features with greater precision, offering researchers and visitors a deeper
understanding of the artifact's original role and cultural significance. The resultant reassembly
also impacts the academic realm, enhancing the museum experience by transforming the
artifact from fragmented pieces into a unified archaeological entity. This unity not only draws
people in, but it also makes them more interested in and appreciative of the artifact's
significance. Projects aimed at collecting scattered artifacts can effectively revive material
heritage and enhance its role in contemporary museum interpretation, provided they adhere to
a clear scientific methodology that emphasizes the principles of documentation, authenticity,
and transparency in presentation.
Regarding the third question, the responses indicated that the vast majority of participants
regard the practice of reuniting scattered artifacts as a vital approach, both cognitively and
interpretively. Participants noted that reassembling an artifact enhances its visual appearance
and helps in restoring its historical narrative, allowing the museum to uncover meanings and
significance that may have been unclear in its fragmented state, such as completing missing
texts or scenes. This process can lead to a reinterpretation of certain historical or religious
aspects associated with the artifact. A substantial number of participants also believed that
reassembled artifacts have greater appeal within exhibition halls, as the act of reassembly is
perceived as a reflection of their importance and value. The effort invested in restoring and
unifying their parts demonstrates a museum's awareness of their cultural significance.
Additionally, participants felt that reassembly highlights the scientific and technical efforts
involved in the restoration process while simultaneously emphasizing the importance of
responsibly preserving and reinterpreting cultural heritage. The participants agreed that this
approach significantly enhances the visitor experience within the museum, particularly when
paired with clear presentations and engaging explanations. The combination of visual
completeness and effective interpretation deepens understanding and fosters interaction,
thereby improving the overall visitor experience.
Additionally, informal interviews were conducted randomly with museum visitors to figure out
their perspective on the reunification of the Amun and Mut dyad. The questions were designed
using clear, non-technical language to ensure they were accessible to the general public,
effectively obtaining true reflections from visitors. The questions were as follows:
"Did you like this statue?" What are your thoughts on its current form? Do you agree with
assembling it this way? Is it useful to reunite the scattered artifacts? And does this approach
affect museum interpretation?
Regarding responses to the questions, most responses emphasize that the participants found the
monument to be their favorite piece of art (statue of Amun and Mut). Contrary to expectations,
which usually favor artworks with complete elements, answers unexpectedly demonstrated
remarkable admiration for this monument, which was regarded as one of the most artistically
beautiful works in the hall collection, despite its present condition. Visitors expressed that the
monument inspired a sense of "emotional awe" and considered it their favorite piece of art due
to its representations of love and human connection that transcend its stone material. Some of
the individual responses were as follows:
- The first aspect that drew my attention was the harmony of the piece. When the parts were
assembled, the statue became visually appealing. I believe that the complete form helps the eye
grasp the concept more quickly. Another one indicated that "I'm not an expert, but I felt that
the completeness made it easier to understand. I pondered it since it was complete; otherwise,
I would have skimmed it. Another visitor expressed that he felt the statue had come back to
life. It was as if reassembling the pieces had restored their identity. He also expressed that
Marwa Hamada
pg. 45
completion of the statue made the written explanation merely an addition, rather than the
primary focus. Some visitors admire the statue, but they observe that in some cases, the
museum may overemphasize the reassembly process at the expense of explaining the history
of the fragmentation itself, which can lead to a lack of understanding about the cultural and
historical significance of the original state of the artwork.
Most participants agreed that a strong relationship exists between the completeness of museum
objects and their interpretation; specifically, the more complete the piece is, the clearer and
more obvious the interpretation becomes for visitors. Some of the individual responses were as
follows: Some visitors emphasize that interpretation becomes easier when the artifact itself
conveys the idea, rather than relying on lengthy explanations from the museum. Others
highlight that reassembling the artifact allows for a greater focus on the object rather than just
the written descriptions. Some respondents argue that this process shifts interpretation from
merely describing individual parts to providing a comprehensive understanding of the entire
concept. Another viewpoint suggests that this interpretive approach is more accessible to
visitors, as it relies on observation rather than reading. Additionally, a different group perceives
that reunification necessitates a rethinking of the museum narrative, placing the artifact itself
as the primary focus of interpretation instead of the accompanying text.
The participants noted the interpretation of the statue of Amun and Mut. They acknowledged
the statue's undeniable visual appeal; however, its current display lacks a thorough explanation
of its history of fragmentation and the various stages involved in its discovery, reassembly, and
repair. Therefore, enhancing the interpretative aspect is essential for enriching the visitor
experience. Modern technologies provide a more effective and engaging solution in this regard,
particularly when they exhibit the artifact alongside interactive digital tools like QR codes.
These codes allow visitors to access information about the statue's origins, its fragmented state,
and the processes of restoration that led to its present form using their mobile devices.
Additionally, digital technologies can present visual reconstructions of the statue's original,
complete shape, aligning with the preferences of today's audience and their learning styles in
the digital age.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, the statue of Amun and Mut serves as a prime example of how reassembly is
essential for restoring an artifact's value. Initially, the statue existed as scattered fragments in
museum storage, lacking cohesive meaning. However, following its restoration, these pieces
became distinctive and drew a broader audience. The process of reuniting its parts transcended
a mere technical endeavor of stone restoration; it symbolized the revival of an artistic entity
and a religious icon that had lost its significance for centuries. Restoring the statue to its
complete form demonstrated that an artifact can only convey its full story when its parts are
reunited. This completeness enhanced the visitor experience and improved the interpretation
of the statue in the museum, allowing it to be prominently displayed in the hall as a distinctive
object rather than being overlooked as merely stored stones. Consequently, this statue
exemplifies that preserving ancient Egyptian identity requires maintaining its exquisite details
and assembling its fragmented parts, ensuring the artifact remains a cohesive entity, resilient
against the ravages of time. Based on these observations, the study concluded with several
essential findings that can be summarized as follows:
The analysis indicated that the reassembly of the monument was more than a mere
restoration; it represented a "reclaiming of identity." The finished structure highlights
artistic and political dimensions, such as nostalgia and reuse, that were absent in its
fragmented state.
The impact of reuniting a colossal dyad of Amun and Mut
46
The results, derived from surveys conducted with specialists and visitors, indicate that
the completed artifact enhances "cognitive clarity" and enriches the museum
experience. This transformation turns the artifact from a silent ruin into a living entity
that conveys story, fostering an emotional connection and deepening appreciation for
the significance of Egyptian heritage.
The study suggests that integrating physical reunification with technological
applications is the most effective method for preserving and displaying scattered
cultural property appropriately.
Marwa Hamada
pg. 47
5. References
1. Abate, A. F. (2019). Virtual and physical recomposition. Journal of Heritage, 5(2), 120.
2. Abd el-Gawad, H., & Stevenson, A. (2021). Egypt’s dispersed heritage: Multidirectional
storytelling through comic art. Journal of Social Archaeology, 21(1), 121145.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605321992929
3. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Reunification. In Cambridge dictionary. Retrieved
February 13, 2026, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/reunification
4. Chahine, P. (2025). Digital reunification and documentation of dispersed artifacts from
Thonis-Heracleion: A metadata case study of the Amun Gereb Naos and a framework for
future storytelling and virtual interpretation. Pharos International Journal of Tourism and
Hospitality, 4 (2), pp. 37-54. https://doi.org/10.21608/pijth.2025.421311.1027
5. Connor, S. (2022). Ancient Egyptian statues: Their many lives and deaths. American
University in Cairo Press.
6. Egypt Museum. (n.d.). Statues of Amun and Mut. Retrieved March 4, 2026, from
https://egypt-museum.com/statues-of-amun-and-mut
7. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. (2021, July 15). The role of digital
technology in the restitution of cultural artifacts. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/science-
technology/the-role-of-digital-technology-in-the-restitution-of-cultural-artifacts/
8. Grand Egyptian Museum [@grandegyptianmuseum]. (2025, July 29). The Grand
Egyptian Museum treasures [Video]. Instagram.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMqYk1ysphc
9. Leitão, H. C. G., & Stolfi, J. (2002). Digital reconstruction of fragmented artifacts.
Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image
Processing (SIBGRAPI), 316323. http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/fragments.html
10. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Reunification. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved
February 13, 2026, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reunification
11. Pietroni, E., & Ferdani, D. (2021). Virtual restoration and virtual reconstruction in cultural
heritage: Terminology, methodologies, visual representation techniques and cognitive
models. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 21, Article e00181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00181
12. Punzalan, R. L. (2014). Barriers and challenges to virtual reunification. Proceedings of the
2014 iConference, 401413. https://doi.org/10.9776/14131
13. Punzalan, R. L. (2013). Virtual reunification: Bits and pieces gathered together to
represent the whole (Publication No. 3594030) [Doctoral dissertation, University of
Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
14. Sourouzian, H. (2018). Statues also die, and they can also come back to life. In Museo
Egizio (Ed.), Statues also die: Destruction and preservation in ancient and modern times.
Proceedings of the International Symposium, Turin 28th29th May 2018 (pp. 1124).
Museo Egizio.
15. Stevenson, A. (2019). Scattered finds: Archaeology, Egyptology and museums. UCL
Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352049
16. Islam Abdel Maaboud, Statue of Amun-Ra and his wife Mut shines in the Grand Egyptian
Museum following its restoration from 79 fragments, EL-Shorouknews, Aug 1 2025,
https://www.shorouknews.com/news/view.aspx?cdate=01082025&id=d221373c-c1c8-
45aa-897d-84615d2940ef